The DOJ is reportedly discussing possible restrictions on firearm ownership for transgender individuals, prompting strong backlash from the NRA and other gun rights groups. While no official policy has been proposed, the conversation has stirred national debate around mental health, civil liberties, and Second Amendment protections.
LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE
WASHINGTON, D.C. (4-minute read) — Amid recent reports that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is exploring legal avenues to prevent transgender individuals from purchasing firearms, the National Rifle Association (NRA) has reaffirmed its stance: all law-abiding Americans, regardless of gender identity, have a constitutional right to bear arms.
This development follows a series of high-profile shootings involving individuals who identified as transgender, including a recent case where a gunman fatally shot two people and injured 18 others at Annunciation School. The firearms used were obtained legally, reigniting the ongoing debate over how mental health intersects with gun ownership laws in the United States.
In a public statement, the NRA declared its opposition to any policy that would “arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process.” The group, which boasts over five million members, emphasized that rights must not be infringed based on identity or unproven assumptions.
Gun Owners of America (GOA) echoed this position with an even firmer response. “GOA opposes any and all gun bans. Full stop,” the group posted to X (formerly Twitter). Senior Vice President Erich Pratt added, “We do not compromise on anyone’s right to keep and bear arms.”
Meanwhile, Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), warned against labeling people “mentally defective” without due legal process, suggesting such a move would likely violate constitutional protections. While NAGR hasn’t formally weighed in, Brown’s remarks indicate similar concerns over potential overreach.
Firearms, Mental Health, and Due Process
According to sources, the DOJ’s internal discussions are in early stages and involve the Office of Legal Counsel and possibly the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They are reportedly examining legal pathways to prevent individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria, particularly those deemed unstable, from acquiring firearms.
Under current federal law, someone can be denied a firearm only if formally adjudicated as mentally incompetent or committed to a mental institution. A 2024 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Rahimi upheld the right to limit firearm access in specific, legally defined cases, but it emphasized the necessity of due process.
A DOJ spokesperson tried to tamp down speculation, stating, “No specific criminal justice proposals have been advanced,” and reaffirmed that the agency is exploring options related to “individuals with specific mental health challenges.”
On the other side of the debate, LGBTQ advocacy groups like GLAAD argue that transgender individuals are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators. “Everyone deserves to be safe and free from violence and discrimination,” GLAAD stated, calling any targeted restriction unjust and dangerous.
This is not the first time the Trump administration has clashed with the transgender community. From removing trans individuals from military service to restricting gender markers on federal IDs, the administration has consistently rolled back protections, fueling fears that this firearm discussion may become another battleground.
Safety Tip: Mental health evaluations related to firearm ownership should always involve due process, legal oversight, and not be based on broad identity categories. Know your local and federal firearm laws to protect your rights and ensure responsible ownership.
Read the full article here